Reach a passive candidate six ways, not one.

Passive candidates ghost a single channel. You send the InMail, you send the email, and the best people — the ones already employed — never see it or never reply. Reply rates on email and InMail keep sliding while LinkedIn Recruiter seat costs climb, so the one channel most teams lean on is getting more expensive and less effective at the same time.

If you run an agency, you feel it in the seat math too: you pay per recruiter even for the ones between reqs. The fix is not a bigger database. It is more ways to actually reach the candidate, and a score you can open and check instead of taking on faith.

Reply-rate and pricing trends reflect widely reported market conditions; verify against your own channel data.

Juicebox is live today and you can start on a free tier. Its PeopleGPT search reads a plain-language query and returns ranked candidates from a database the company reports at 800M+ profiles across 30+ sources (juicebox.ai, as of June 2026), larger than the 500M MartyHR draws on. In December 2025 Juicebox added ATS Internal Talent Rediscovery and Network Sourcing, so it now reaches owned data alongside the open web.

If you want a sourcing tool you can buy and use today, with the largest candidate index in this comparison, Juicebox is a strong choice, and we will say so.

Juicebox documents email outreach, and 2026 user reviews describe the same; we found no published SMS, WhatsApp, Telegram, voice, or in-platform LinkedIn messaging (juicebox.ai/outreach, as of June 2026). MartyHR is built for six channels — email, LinkedIn, SMS, WhatsApp, Telegram, and voice — in one sequence of up to 12 steps with conditional triggers. When a candidate ghosts on email, the cadence reaches them another way automatically.

Three more reasons agencies and TA teams are joining the list:

• Billed per connected account, not per seat. Juicebox publishes per-seat pricing with credits plus a per-agent add-on (juicebox.ai/pricing, as of June 2026). Account-based billing maps to how an agency staffs many client searches — a billing-model difference, not a lower-price claim.
• Your network and HRIS in the same query. Juicebox's Network Sourcing uses manual CSV uploads on the Business tier; MartyHR searches your team's first-degree LinkedIn network and your HRIS (e.g. BambooHR) alongside your ATS in one query, no upload step.
• A score you can read. Juicebox returns narrative AI justifications; MartyHR marks every criterion found, potential, or no evidence and rolls them into a 0–100 fit score you can open. (MartyHR capabilities are pre-launch, designed to spec.)

Choose Juicebox if you need to start today, want the largest candidate database in this comparison, or run search-led sourcing where email is the main channel. It is live, self-serve, and has a free tier; MartyHR has none of those yet. We will point you to it for that buyer.

Choose MartyHR if you reach candidates on more than email, run an agency where per-account billing fits the work better than per seat, or want one query across your network, HRIS, ATS, and a global database with a fit score you can read. Join the launch list and early joiners lock in design-partner pricing and a direct line on the roadmap.